Essay 5


by Ben Fishler

Once we drill a hole in southern Georgia and discover that the sandstone is older than 66 MYA and the underlying volcanism is younger than 66 MYA, we will be able to add to the list of things that the new theory explains better than the current theory. All of the references (seen below) to "chapters" are to my detailed book on an updated antipodal focusing theory, found at

1, GULF OF MEXICO — Rather than just assuming that the Gulf of Mexico was always a permanent feature of the landscape as does the current theory, the new theory will now have extensive evidence showing that the impact of 66 MYA created the Gulf of Mexico by pushing a huge mass of limestone to the southwest, forming the Yucatan and the shape of the rest of Mexico (see Chapter 2.5).

2, CONTEMPORANEOUS ANTIPODAL VOLCANISM FROM A LARGE IMPACT — Despite the fact that the current theory insists that this is impossible, the evidence will clearly show that this happened in the dinosaur-killing impact of 66 MYA. The evidence will be so irrefutable that the concept of contemporaneous volcanism at the antipode of a large impact will be clear to any fair-minded geologist. Furthermore, the fact that the latitude of the volcanism of the mascon in southern Georgia will be exactly antipodal to the Deccan traps will seal the deal (see Chapter 2.5).

3. VIDALIA ONIONS — We will solve the mystery of why Vidalia onions only grow in part of the sandstone area of Georgia and not the whole area (because the area of actual impact would be resulfurized by volcanism that came AFTER the sand was brought in by a huge tsunami) (see Chapter 2.5).

4. EXPLANATION OF SOIL CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA — The current theory explains the sandstone area of Georgia as being the result of that area being under water and gradually built up by sand. Evidence from the drilling will show that rather than slow build up over millions of years, the sand arrived all at once due to a huge tsunami, with foraminifera dated to 66 - 75 MYA. Furthermore, the volcanism beneath the sandstone will date to just under 66 MYA, because it is a mascon and not an "ancient volcano complex from the Triassic period" (see Chapter 2.5). 6.